Advice in judging a presidential candidate I have followed
was, “It’s not what they say it’s what they write that counts”. Position papers
were the thing to study. The election of 2016 did not revolve around position
papers. Hillary had a bunch on her website, Trump not so much. The media did
not care.
In the presidential campaign of 2000, it was said that
George W. Bush was preferred by many because he was viewed to be someone you
would enjoy having a beer with. So it was important to personally identify with
the candidate.
In this Fareed Zakaria article, and in his CNN program on
December 4, the “personal identity” angle was revealed in more detail in regard
to the white working class (WWC):
- WWC folks do not vote based on policy. They vote for someone they identify with and then adopt his or her policies.
- They do not like elites because elites boss them around every day.
- They admire the rich. They would like to have more money but keep their current lifestyle.
Be sure to check out the links to the Harvard Business
Review article in the Fareed Zakaria link, above. It is very informative.
In the book “What’s the Matter With Kansas?” Thomas Frank
probed the question of why the WWC voted against their own interests. That is,
why do they vote Republican? One good reason, I believe, is that since the
Republican Party has for years expressed a skepticism about the federal
government (‘government is the problem', ‘Washington is broken’, etc.) the WWC
more easily identified with them. Some pundits have stated that Hillary likely
would have prevailed if she had expressed her working class childhood and time
lived in Arkansas. Her husband knew how to do that. Also recall Joe Biden
always talking about his origin in Scranton, PA.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be nice, now.